Home / Content & Social / LinkedIn

Edit Your LinkedIn Drafts with ChatGPT in 5 Passes

Five editing passes for a LinkedIn draft you wrote: pick up your voice from 10 recent posts, rewrite in scannable creator style, add curiosity and momentum, sharpen it for founders and decision makers, then a final retention polish that keeps your voice.

linkedineditingwriting voiceretentionghostwriting
  1. Phase 1 — Learn your voice from past posts
    My last 10 LinkedIn posts:
    [paste your last 10 posts]
    
    My new draft:
    [paste your new draft]
    
    Task:
    1. Study the 10 posts and find the patterns in tone, pacing, sentence length and structure.
    2. Work out which of these patterns perform best.
    3. List the 3-5 style rules you found, written so I can reuse them on every post.
    4. Rewrite my new draft applying those patterns, keeping it simple and human.
    
    If the past posts or the draft are missing, ask me to paste them before you start.
  2. Phase 2 — Scannable creator style
    My post: [paste your post]
    
    Task: rewrite this post for an audience of high-performing creators.
    
    Style:
    - short sentences
    - one idea on each line
    - calm, confident voice
    - a strong opening
    - easy to read
    - no buzzwords
    - no long paragraphs
    
    Before answering, check that every line can be skimmed in about one second.
    
    If the post is missing, ask me to paste it first.
  3. Phase 3 — Curiosity and momentum
    My post: [paste your post]
    
    Context: the post is correct, but it reads as boring.
    
    Task: edit it using audience psychology:
    - Opening (hook): raise curiosity with tension or surprise.
    - Middle: keep the momentum with proof, an example or a contrast.
    - Close: end on a lesson, takeaway or question that feels natural and earned.
    
    Cut anything that is fluff: if removing about 30 percent of the text makes it better, remove it.
    
    If the post is missing, ask me to paste it first.
  4. Phase 4 — Senior voice for founders and decision makers
    My draft: [paste your draft]
    
    Task: rewrite this draft in the voice of a senior professional addressing founders and decision makers. It should sound credible, never corporate.
    
    Style:
    - clear thinking
    - clean language
    - easy to scan
    - zero fluff
    - swap vague words for concrete ones
    - include one example
    
    Final check: every claim is backed by an example; if it is not, remove the claim.
    
    If the draft is missing, ask me to paste it first.
  5. Phase 5 — Final retention polish in your voice
    My post: [paste your post]
    
    Task: this is the last editing pass. Polish the post for retention:
    - make the hook sharper
    - remove the weak lines
    - improve the flow from the first line to the last
    - keep my voice intact
    
    Final check: the first 2 lines must make the reader want to read the next one.
    
    Output: only the finished post, with no comments or explanations.
    
    If the post is missing, ask me to paste it first.
Download pack .md
More in LinkedIn
160-210 Word LinkedIn Post to Promote Your Live TrainingNewLinkedInWrites a 160 to 210 word LinkedIn post that promotes your live training: it opens with the problem, outlines what attendees will gain, gives the date and time and closes with a clear call to register.
Live training: [title and topic]
Date and time: [date and time]
Registration link: [link]

Task: write a LinkedIn post of 160 to 210 words that promotes this training.

Structure:
1. Open with the problem.
2. Outline what attendees will gain.
3. Include the date and time.
4. Close with a clear call to action to register.
200-260 Word Contrarian LinkedIn Post with EvidenceNewLinkedInWrites a 200 to 260 word LinkedIn post that opens with a clear contrarian position, backs it with evidence, recognizes the usual view and ends by restating what actually works, with no questions or exclamation marks.
My contrarian position: [your stance]
Evidence I can use: [evidence, if any]

Task: write a LinkedIn post of 200 to 260 words.

Structure:
1. Open by stating the contrarian position clearly.
2. Support it with evidence.
3. Acknowledge the conventional view.
4. Close by restating what works instead.

Rules: no questions, no exclamation marks.
200-260 Word LinkedIn Client Story Post That Invites ConversationsNewLinkedInWrites a 200 to 260 word first-person LinkedIn post that opens with a client's result, tells the story, shares one practical lesson and ends by inviting people in a similar situation to start a conversation.
Client case: [client result and story]

Task: write a LinkedIn post in the first person, 200 to 260 words.
1. Open with the client's result.
2. Tell the story.
3. Share one practical lesson.
4. Close by inviting people in a similar situation to start a conversation with me.
200-270 Word LinkedIn Results Post That TeachesNewLinkedInWrites a 200 to 270 word first-person LinkedIn post that opens with a specific result, then covers the situation before, what changed, what drove it and one surprise, ending with a practical takeaway. Educational in tone, not promotional.
The result: [specific result]
Context: [what happened]

Task: write a LinkedIn post in the first person, 200 to 270 words long.

Structure:
1. Open with the specific result.
2. Explain the situation before, what changed and what made the difference, including one thing that surprised me.
3. Close with a takeaway the reader can apply.

Tone: educational, never promotional.
200-280 Word LinkedIn Post That Teaches a ProcessNewLinkedInWrites a 200 to 280 word first-person LinkedIn post that opens with a hook from your own experience, teaches a process step by step in short paragraphs (each an action plus why it works) and ends with one sentence on what the reader gains.
Topic: [process you want to teach]
Relevant experience of mine: [your experience]

Task: write a LinkedIn post in the first person, 200 to 280 words long.

Structure:
1. Opening: a hook drawn from my own experience.
2. Body: the process taught step by step, in short paragraphs. Each paragraph gives one action and explains why it works.
3. Close: a single sentence about the result the reader will get.