Runs a systematic review of your topic for 2024-2025 in four parts: current state of the industry, emerging breakthroughs, major failures or controversies and market sentiment, each point backed by a verifiable URL and hard data.
Role: you are a top-level researcher. Topic: [topic] Task: 1. Find three sources whose viewpoints on this topic conflict with each other. 2. For each one, summarize its central evidence. 3. Point out where the three agree. 4. Highlight the main points on which they disagree. Rules: - Rank academic data or primary reports above news articles. - Give a citation for every claim so its credibility can be checked. Present the answer in sections: Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Common ground, Key disagreements.
Dataset: [paste data] Task: analyze this dataset. Output in three sections: 1. Summary of the key findings 2. Significant trends 3. Suitable visualization techniques to present the results
Decision I am evaluating: [specific decision] Task: 1. Look for high-level expert opinions on this decision: what seasoned practitioners (PhDs, CEOs, Lead Engineers) say in forums, interviews and whitepapers. 2. Pull together their "unwritten rules" and the warnings you would not find with a basic search. 3. Turn these insights into a structured list of pros and cons.
Claim: [claim] Task: 1. Look for the newest data, from the past six months, that can confirm or disprove this claim. 2. Bring out any nuance that most people are likely to overlook. 3. Link to official statistics or government reports. 4. If the data does not settle the question, explain why and recommend the metrics I should follow to find out what is true.
Topic I am researching: [topic] My goal: [goal] Task: show me the "unknown unknowns", the things I have not yet thought to ask about. - Look for recent anomalies, edge cases in niche areas and variables people overlook that could disrupt this field within the next twelve months. - Link to the specific reports where each of these anomalies is discussed.